The Django Project is managed by a team of volunteers pursuing three goals:
The Django Project isn’t a legal entity. The Django Software Foundation, a non-profit organization, handles financial and legal matters related to the Django Project. Other than that, the Django Software Foundation lets the Django Project manage the development of the Django framework, its ecosystem and its community.
The Django core team makes the decisions, nominates its new members, and elects its technical board. While it holds decision power in theory, it aims at using it as rarely as possible in practice. Rough consensus should be the norm and formal voting an exception.
The core team is the group of trusted volunteers who manage the Django Project. They assume many roles required to achieve the project’s goals, especially those that require a high level of trust. They make the decisions that shape the future of the project.
Core team members are expected to act as role models for the community and custodians of the project, on behalf of the community and all those who rely on Django.
They will intervene, where necessary, in online discussions or at official Django events on the rare occasions that a situation arises that requires intervention.
They have authority over the Django Project infrastructure, including the Django Project website itself, the Django GitHub organization and repositories, the Trac bug tracker, the mailing lists, IRC channels, etc.
Core team members may participate in formal votes, typically to nominate new team members and to elect the technical board.
Some contributions don’t require commit access. Depending on the reasons why a contributor joins the team, they may or may not have commit permissions to the Django code repository.
However, should the need arise, any team member may ask for commit access by writing to the core team’s mailing list. Access will be granted unless the person withdraws their request or the technical board vetoes the proposal.
Core team members who have commit access are referred to as “committers” or “core developers”.
Other permissions, such as access to the servers, are granted to those who need them through the same process.
As the project matures, contributions go way beyond code. Here’s an incomplete list of areas where contributions may be considered for joining the core team, in no particular order:
Very few areas are reserved to core team members:
Core team membership acknowledges sustained and valuable efforts that align well with the philosophy and the goals of the Django Project.
It is granted by a four fifths majority of votes cast in a core team vote and no veto by the technical board.
Core team members are always looking for promising contributors, teaching them how the project is managed, and submitting their names to the core team’s vote when they’re ready. If you would like to join the core team, you can contact a core team member privately or ask for guidance on the Django Core Mentorship mailing-list.
There’s no time limit on core team membership. However, in order to provide the general public with a reasonable idea of how many people maintain Django, core team members who have stopped contributing are encouraged to declare themselves as “past team members”. Those who haven’t made any non-trivial contribution in two years may be asked to move themselves to this category, and moved there if they don’t respond. Past team members lose their privileges such as voting rights and commit access.
The technical board is a group of experienced and active committers who steer technical choices. Their main concern is to maintain the quality and stability of the Django Web Framework.
The technical board holds two prerogatives:
In both cases, the technical board is a last resort. In these matters, it fulfills a similar function to the former Benevolent Dictators For Life.
When the board wants to exercise one of these prerogatives, it must hold a private, simple majority vote on the resolution. The quorum is the full committee — each member must cast a vote or abstain explicitly. Then the board communicates the result, and if possible the reasons, on the appropriate mailing-list. There’s no appeal for such decisions.
In addition, at its discretion, the technical board may act in an advisory capacity on non-technical decisions.
The technical board is an elected group of five committers. They’re expected to be experienced but there’s no formal seniority requirement. Its current composition is published here.
A new board is elected after each feature release of Django. The election process is managed by a returns officer nominated by the outgoing technical board. The election process works as follows:
Candidates advertise their application for the technical board to the team.
They must be committers already. There’s no term limit for technical board members.
Each team member can vote for zero to five people among the candidates. Candidates are ranked by the total number of votes they received.
In case of a tie, the person who joined the core team earlier wins.
Both the application and the voting period last between one and two weeks, at the outgoing board’s discretion.
Changes to this document require a four fifths majority of votes cast in a core team vote and no veto by the technical board.